57: Avoiding Brand Dissonance
For years, I’ve told my clients and prospects that I’m not trying to get 100% of their design work. Multiple auction marketers have heard me say, “Just bring me in on your big or showcase auctions.” Sovereignty has more than taken care of my workflow, and I prefer customers to find my work a good value than to be sold into something they can’t afford.
So, while that’s still my official invitation to auctioneers, I’ve been experiencing some internal dissonance regarding that position. From time to time, I’ll see different clients’ lower-end work or see local vendor ads for a national product or franchise that do not match the national campaigns or branding. (Car dealers and closeout stores are notorious for this.) They just don’t match. The logos are off; the fonts are unprofessional; the margins or spacing is inconsistent; the images haven’t been edited or presented for best presentation; information flows in a strange order. It’s as if their brand is schizophrenic.
I get it. Sometimes, we have to take small jobs to keep the lights aglow and phones ringing in the office. But we have to be careful our work doesn’t look cheap, or we’ll be needing that cheap work more and more—in lieu of the bigger transactions. We can cheapen our established, progressive brands by slapping our name on shoddy advertising, our signs in front of entry-level work.
Do you remember the Cadillac Cimmaron? Coming off the 1970’s oil crises and reacting to CAFE standards, the GM luxury brand thought it could grab more buyers by slapping leather seats and a Cadillac emblem on a Chevy Cavalier. Economy buyers saw past the badges; luxury buyers left the brand for upstart Japanese lines and proven European rivals. Reviewed as one of the 50 worst cars ever manufactured††, “[t]he Cimarron’s failure was part of a series of events throughout the 1980s and 1990s which eroded the brand’s share of the US market from 3.8% in 1979 to 2.2% in 1997[.]”†
Cadillac pretty much lost a generation of buyers by mixing its luxury brand image with cheap brand extension.
Cadillac’s hard lesson taught its competitors what not to do. Toyota has different locations and building designs for Lexus dealerships. BMW requires MINI franchisees to house both sales and service centers in separate buildings from its BMW models. Daimler sells it Smart Car units through Penske dealerships, not Mercedes ones.
So, it’s not so much about having an economy product or service. You just have to be careful about how those smaller sales reflect on the shiny deals you want people to assume are your standard.
You can create either separate divisions or companies, branding or color schemes—like corporate America does for different product lines. For about $2,000-$3,000, you should be able to obtain a professional logo, basic stationary, company brochures, and branded landing web page that can redirect after a short brand splash to an Auction Zip or Global Auction Guide auction calendar for your lower-end sales (instead of a whole new calendar site). Such brand differentiation has the potential to be as much of an investment in your priority brand as would be extra runs of your current high-end collateral.
If you can’t afford the time or resources to separate your markets or manage separate brands, you can raise the floor on the low-end look to make the differences in branding look less extreme. If some of your auction budgets require postcards, they should match your brochures. If your marketing plans can afford only black and white or two-ink brochures, they should be designed on the same templates as your color pieces.
If you have to go with smaller ads, create separate templates for those—not just shrunken or squished logos slammed in a corner below five-point text. Or use line ads (or small display ads without your logo), so that the graphical difference is less noticeable and associable. It’s pretty inexpensive to create different email templates, and changing a company or division name or a URL on a press release takes mere seconds. Your generic and directional signs should at least match your custom ones in color; font matching would be a professional, low-cost touch, too. Most web sites you use for marketing are universal in design; so, you’re okay there—especially since most don’t show your logo and branding, anyway.
Not every auction can be a a feather in your cap. But you have to be careful to limit the time your cap is collecting change on the sidewalk.
[tip]
Sometimes, my Mondays are crap. I mean, my Sundays and even some Friday nights are filled with spiritual highs and soul-level fulfillment, emotional connection and obedient surrender. Next to my valid resumé of Holy Spirit moments I drop a pile of self-worship, scorching unkindness, and primal depravity. It smells. It spoils and sours everything, even beautiful things. It can even ruin designated God environments. Stack enough of it, and it wafts doubt onto sure things.
From what I hear, this is common. Cultures around the world see it so much, they use it as evidence that all religions spring from the same contaminated fountain of human imagination, that the God deal isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. I mean, nobody likes hypocrites. Nobody craves inconsistency. Nobody wants to waste time on something that doesn’t truly do what it’s supposed to do. (Well, except for infomercial and QVC buyers.)
The way I reconcile that is to seek forgiveness vertically and horizontally, to repent and make a U-turn at this green arrow left lane—even if I might only make it a mile or two until I take the wrong exit again. And while it’d be better not to need stop lights, I can at least be thankful for them and use them as God intended.
[footer]†Flammang, James M., and Ron Kowalke: Standard Catalog of American Cars 1976-1999, page 149-189. Krause Publications, 1999.††Peters, Eric: Automotive Atrocities! The Cars We Love to Hate, pp.94-95. Motorbooks International, 2004.
Cadillac ad used with permission from ProductionCars.com
Image(s) used by permission through purchase from iStockPhoto.com ©2010[/footer]




